Investors File Lawsuit Against NFT Founder for $3 Million Bitcoin Mining Fraud

By: coin central|2025/05/15 08:30:09
0
Share
copy
TLDRHashling NFT founder Jonathan Mills sued for allegedly misappropriating millions from the project and related Bitcoin mining operationInvestors claim they raised $1.46 million from NFT drops but received no returnsMills allegedly created a flawed shareholder agreement giving himself 67% equity and voting rightsPlaintiffs are suing for fraud and breach of fiduciary dutyMills reportedly admitted having no money or NFT experience before starting the projectInvestors in the Hashling NFT project have filed a lawsuit against founder Jonathan Mills, accusing him of stealing millions of dollars from both the NFT venture and a related Bitcoin mining operation.According to court documents filed on May 14 in Illinois, the plaintiffs allege that Mills misappropriated funds and failed to pay promised equity returns. The legal action comes after investors claim they were ghosted by Mills following their investments.The lawsuit states that investors raised a combined $1.46 million from two NFT drops on the Solana and Bitcoin blockchains. Despite the success of these drops, the plaintiffs say they never received any returns from their investments.At the heart of the dispute is Satoshi Labs LLC, formerly known as Proof of Work Labs LLC. Mills, who serves as founder and CEO of the company, allegedly told investors he had transferred assets from Hashling NFT and at least $3 million from the Bitcoin mining project to this holding company.The Shareholder Agreement ControversyThe plaintiffs claim Mills created a flawed shareholder agreement to justify his control over the project’s assets. This agreement was allegedly “rife with errors” designed to support his claims.Under this agreement, Mills received a 67% equity share in the company. Other investors who contributed up to $20,000 each received just 2% equity in return.Mills also secured a 67% voting stake on all matters related to the company. This gave him overwhelming control, as no other partner held more than 2% voting rights.When the company name changed from Proof of Work Labs to Satoshi Labs, Mills assured investors their equity stakes would remain unchanged. However, the plaintiffs claim this was part of a scheme to maintain control over the assets.The origins of the Hashling NFT project trace back to discussions between Mills and plaintiff Dustin Steerman, who had worked with Mills previously. What’s strange about this partnership is that Mills reportedly told Steerman he had “no money and no NFT-related experience” before starting the project.“[Mills] had a willingness to help push the project forward, and he did have an idea at the start,” said Clinton Ind, the investors’ attorney from Ind Legal Group LLC.To make the project successful, Mills and Steerman brought in other investors who now serve as plaintiffs in the case. These team members helped with NFT art creation, social media marketing, and even attended NFT conferences in New York to promote the project.The lawsuit even claims Mills convinced his girlfriend to invest in the Hashling NFTs project.Beyond the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims, the plaintiffs are seeking a constructive trust over the project’s assets and full legal restitution. This would give them control over the assets while the case is resolved.Cointelegraph reported that they reached out to Mills for comment but did not receive an immediate response at the time of reporting.The case highlights the risks investors face in the largely unregulated NFT space, where project founders can wield considerable power over funds and operations.Court documents show the plaintiffs are asking the court to hold Mills accountable for his actions and to recover the money they believe was wrongfully taken from the project.The post Investors File Lawsuit Against NFT Founder for $3 Million Bitcoin Mining Fraud appeared first on CoinCentral.

-- Price

--

You may also like

The impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: not a single negative factor, but a more complex reshaping of competition

OUSD will not be the last new competitor; Circle needs to respond more actively in terms of products, distribution, and ecosystem collaboration.

Li Feifei's latest long article: When video generation, robots, and NVIDIA all claim to be world models, we need a taxonomy

Language gives machines a way to talk about the world. The world model is the means by which machines ultimately understand, imagine, reason, and interact with it.

Blaming the desolation of the cryptocurrency world on the rise of AI is a form of intellectual laziness

The emergence of giants signifies a mature business model. Although it will reduce speculative space, there is also enough room for error, allowing for the continuous emergence of new forces.

Strategy Founder: The Next 10 Years of Bitcoin

In the next decade, the biggest evolution of Bitcoin is precisely "responding to change with invariance." The four-year cycle is giving way to capital flows such as ETFs, corporate and sovereign reserves, and bank credit, while digital credit and digital currency will grow layer upon layer on top of...

Forbes Special Report: Stablecoin cross-border payments are faster now, but not cheaper yet

Cross-border payments using stablecoins are rapidly expanding, bringing speed and accessibility, but due to insufficient institutional liquidity, they have not yet delivered on their promised cost savings. The technology has been validated, and regulations are improving, but the industry has not yet...

A valuation of 8 billion dollars, doubling in 8 months! What makes the crypto-friendly bank Erebor Bank stand out?

Erebor is a high-profile experiment taking place at the intersection of banking, cryptocurrency, and industrial policy.

Contents

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:[email protected]
VIP Program:[email protected]